Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

HPR - HPR3082: RFC 5005 Part 1 – Paged and archived feeds? Who cares?

1 post in this topic

This conversation took almost an hour, so I split it into two shows:

  • Part 1 talks mostly about the RFC itself, what it means and why.
  • Part 2 goes into personal experiences with the RFC and with syndication in general, in particular in the context of web comics. This is part 1.

The why

When serving most RSS/Atom feed readers today, you have to choose: Do you make a complete feed with all the things you ever published, or do you make a shorter feed with just the latest entries?

This is a trade-off with pros and cons, and it seems like a trade-off you have to make, but a solution to let your Atom feed have the cake and eat it too existed already 13 years ago, if only any of our feed readers would adhere to it: RFC 5005, Feed Paging and Archiving

The what was published in September 2007

  • The XML namespace for RFC 5005 elements is, aliased as fh below.
  • Section 2 defines the complete feed: It is one document (Atom file) that contains the entire set the feed describes. The document is marked with an fh:complete element.
  • Section 3 defines the paged feed: It is a series of documents connected with Atom link elements with rel set to the link relations first, last, previous or next.
  • Section 4 defines the archived feed: It has a subscription document that may change at any time, and a series of archive documents that are expected to have stable contents and URIs. The link relations defined are current, prev-archive and next-archive. The semantics are clearer: prev-archive refers to previously published entries, and because the contents are stable you can stop when you see a URI to a document you already have. Archive documents are marked with the fh:archive element.

The who

In this show I’m talking to:



Conversation notes

  • Google Reader was terminated 2013-07-01, all subscription data permanently gone on 2013-07-15:
  • Mastodon had Atom feeds with paging, but the feeds went away when OStatus went away:
  • HTML4 does indeed define the HTML link relations:
    It has prev rather than the previous of RFC 5005, but mentions that some browsers support previous as an alias.
  • HTML5 also defines the HTML link relations:
    Here previous is a lower-case must for historical reasons.
  • IANA manages the Registry of Link Relations:
    It references RFC 5005 for the Section 4 relations, but not the Section 3 ones.
  • RFC 5005 singles out its own Section 3 (Paged Feeds) as the best-effort, loose, discouraged model.
    • Section 3:
      Therefore, clients SHOULD NOT present paged feeds as coherent or complete, or make assumptions to that effect.
    • Section 4:
      Unlike paged feeds, archived feeds enable clients to do this without losing entries.
  • I’m confused about it in the show, but the RFC is clear that an archived feed has one dynamic subscription document, which points to a chain of immutable archive documents.
  • Back in 2002, Aaron Swartz published his joke MIME-header-based RSS 3:
    The cultural context at the time and the rivalry between RSS 0.91+, RSS 1.0, RSS 2.0 and Atom deserves a show of its own.

View the full article


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0