Irongeek

Ordered an Eeee PC 901, need advice

22 posts in this topic

Just ordered my Eeee PC 901. I could only get it with Windows, but I plan to wipe that and put on Ubuntu. Shouls I go with normal 9.04, or is the Netbook remix worth it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just ordered my Eeee PC 901. I could only get it with Windows, but I plan to wipe that and put on Ubuntu. Shouls I go with normal 9.04, or is the Netbook remix worth it?

Isn't Backtrack 4 Unbuntu-based now? Use that.

Or ask around on forums.eeeuser.com

And check out the hardware mod forum. It's electronic pron. Hmm barebone usb hub internal mods...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the primary difference with the netbook remix is the watered down interface. I'd just go with vanilla Ubuntu.

Tell me how the wireless works with 9.04. I had problems with 8.10.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Remix is probably good for a SSD setup since it is small. I assume since you ordered one with Windows it has a hard drive. I would load the full blown version on that. 9.04 standard works fine on my Acer Aspire One including wireless. You might dual boot with backtrack too.

Thanks for all the good info on your site too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like this one comes with Windows. It only has 12gb pf storage total, so I plan to boot back track from a USB. The Super Talent Picos are great for that since they are so low profile.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a 900 with an install of Ubuntu 8.04, and it works flawlessly except ACPI is a bit flaky. It depends on which hardware the netbook has and general Linux support for it. With my 2133 I had to install the official HP SLED distro... That was just because it has a Broadcom chipset and firmware for that particular model is closed source. I'm talking about the firmware in /lib/firmware/, and not on the wireless card itself.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, one of the reasons I did not get a Dell a90 is because it had a Broadcom chipset. My Eee PC 901 should have an RaLink as I understand it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, one of the reasons I did not get a Dell a90 is because it had a Broadcom chipset. My Eee PC 901 should have an RaLink as I understand it.

Yea, but the a90 costs half of the 901. $199 directly from Dell. And they both can come with linux, and both have normal looking touchpads (I HATE those buttons on the side ones. So crappy)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one I ordered came out to about the same price as the comparable Dell a90.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Netbook Remix has better hardware support for the Eee than vanilla Ubuntu, plus it's been compiled with optimizations for the Atom. Why not install it; you can always remove the "watered-down interface" and use regular GNOME.

Edited by Spyril
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Netbook Remix has better hardware support for the Eee than vanilla Ubuntu, plus it's been compiled with optimizations for the Atom. Why not install it; you can always remove the "watered-down interface" and use regular GNOME.

Thanks, I'll give that a shot. Maybe the custom kernel for the atom will squeeze out more battery life.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont bother with Netbook remix it isnt compiled for LPIA yet, just grab the jaunty LPIA (for atom cpus) in the alternate downloads. LPIA does in fact give your netbook more battery life, and def. runs cooler vs i386 releases

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any disadvantages to using the LPIA Kernel? Can I use the same software repositories?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None that I can see as of yet, and i've gone thru both distros since 8.04 (back and forth) theres a big repository for lpia and anything you dont see can convert the .deb's over pretty easy. I just have the standard stuff on mine (kismet etc.)

But everything does work outta box 99% tested for the hardware (all Fn+options cept wireless on/off) cpu throttling etc.. but the main factor was for me since dell's dont have fans internally was heat going from i386 to lpia was an easy 15degree lower and battery life seems greater.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
None that I can see as of yet, and i've gone thru both distros since 8.04 (back and forth) theres a big repository for lpia and anything you dont see can convert the .deb's over pretty easy. I just have the standard stuff on mine (kismet etc.)

I agree, I haven't found many packages that didn't exist in the lpia repositories except for a few oddball things that weren't in any repository. While I didn't see as dramatic of a heat\performance issue on my netbook, there was a noticeable difference in performance going from an i386 based release to lpia.

BTW, if you need to install a regular i386 package, you actually don't have to convert it, you just need to:

dpkg -i --force-architecture some-i386.deb
Edited by mecca_
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way guys, I've tested out VMWare on my 901, it runs ok when I ran the vm from and external HD, but running the VM from the internal flash is laggy as hell.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

personally i would have just gone for the asus xandros iso as it has full support and is debian based so unlock the kde and its basically the same thing as ubuntu accept faster boot time full hardware support and all the hotkeys act already working.

have 904 so screwed and have to use eeeubuntu which is slower than xp, updated to 9.04 ubuntu i think.. have weird problem with sound so going to bug asus and see if i can get a xandros disk, dont have the weird static issue its just super quiet have to turn volume to max to hear it be like 1/7th the volume of windows was..

edit: using ext4 instead of ext3 to increase speed? jw didn't feel like reading as i dont have ssd.

Edited by dinscurge
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
personally i would have just gone for the asus xandros iso as it has full support and is debian based so unlock the kde and its basically the same thing as ubuntu accept faster boot time full hardware support and all the hotkeys act already working.

have 904 so screwed and have to use eeeubuntu which is slower than xp, updated to 9.04 ubuntu i think.. have weird problem with sound so going to bug asus and see if i can get a xandros disk, dont have the weird static issue its just super quiet have to turn volume to max to hear it be like 1/7th the volume of windows was..

edit: using ext4 instead of ext3 to increase speed? jw didn't feel like reading as i dont have ssd.

I have an asus eee 701 and i've tried a few different linux distos on it and the one that works best imo is the default xandros. With a little tweaking it can become very usable. The only problem is the xandros repositories. IIRC the ones used by asus dont have that many packages, although debain (i think it was debian, it's been a while since i played with it) repositories can be added but be aware that something may break if you use them (just gotta be careful). I was even playing with keeping the stock OS and stripping out everything i didnt want. The problem was that alot of things i didnt want were actually needed to boot (like X. WTF! X is a dependency for some of their core packages and without it you cant boot the machine). It took too much time and effort so instead i now keep the stock xandros installed because of the hardware support, fast boot time etc and use a flash drive to boot something a bit beefier when i need it, like Ubuntu or backtrack.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried Arch Linux? It's a very good distro, light and fast..you can simply install it on your eepc...it is considered the expert's distro!!lol Have fun to try it and later say us your response! ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now