Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
g3x

Nazi's Beheading People

59 posts in this topic

It is true Marx lived in a very different world to the appearances of the eye. Yes there existed a Capitalist society in name. At that time people one could liken most of society with how China is now. Lots and lots of unskilled labor. Those who control the labor are the leaders. Citizens grew increasingly discontent with dismal living standards. We see our society now taking a 180. With schools turning out students according to Fabian doctrine we are on our way into our own version of socialism. As it is you have blowhards like O'Reilly, Hannity, Medved, Limbaugh coat their messages in herd mentality and group think most favorable to one who desires unbridled control with as little as dissent as possible. I forgot where I read it but something said that communism in the 21st Century will be cloaked under the guise of Democracy. The only thing standing in the way of a complete tyranny in America is the Constitution. People say that we are free in this country but in reality financial bondage does the silent job of keeping the people running their respective mouse wheels and we keep throwing things at them to keep them occupied. Why do you think they haven't secured our borders, are trying to make 15-20 million illegals citizens, and have now allowed mexican truckers into our nation. http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7002057

Very insightful article explaining how America is slowly being taken over by communist principles.

http://www.illuminati-news.com/american-communism.htm

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
baby-hackribs,

That wasn't the reply I was inquiring for, but I understand your points.

Well, what were you inquiring for? :P, All in good debate my friend, sorry if i misinterpreted you.

It is true Marx lived in a very different world to the appearances of the eye. Yes there existed a Capitalist society in name. At that time people one could liken most of society with how China is now. Lots and lots of unskilled labor. Those who control the labor are the leaders. Citizens grew increasingly discontent with dismal living standards. We see our society now taking a 180. With schools turning out students according to Fabian doctrine we are on our way into our own version of socialism. As it is you have blowhards like O'Reilly, Hannity, Medved, Limbaugh coat their messages in herd mentality and group think most favorable to one who desires unbridled control with as little as dissent as possible. I forgot where I read it but something said that communism in the 21st Century will be cloaked under the guise of Democracy. The only thing standing in the way of a complete tyranny in America is the Constitution. People say that we are free in this country but in reality financial bondage does the silent job of keeping the people running their respective mouse wheels and we keep throwing things at them to keep them occupied. Why do you think they haven't secured our borders, are trying to make 15-20 million illegals citizens, and have now allowed mexican truckers into our nation. http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7002057

Very insightful article explaining how America is slowly being taken over by communist principles.

http://www.illuminati-news.com/american-communism.htm

You are right about financial bondage, living off the grid FTW!!

Unfortunately (while we are on the topic of controlled societies) I am fairly certain that our currency will become completely electronic within the next 2 decades and by that point anonymity will be harder than it is already to obtain.

I forget the source of this qoute:

Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes it's laws.

It's completely true.

I love this thread, it should be pinned IMO and given the title: Communism Debate/It all started when some Nazi beheaded a dude on video, got it on the internet and the link was posted here...

I <3 Debates with intelligent people.

--p0d

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right on, delicatessen. Expounding on some statesments I have made previously.

baby-hackribs,

Mayer Rothschild said that. The Rothschilds are the creators of the fractional reserve, fiat currency banking system that currently prevails through the majority of the world and that many would argue are the central issues with this country. Maybe you are aware that the Federal Reserve is not any more federal than Federal Express? It's a private Delaware Corporation operated for profit (regardless of the non-profit type) with tax exempt status (the reason for the non-profit or religious type). It is an unnecessary middle man in our society that heavily burdens our citizens with unnecessary taxes and political control. Read the Rothschild quote to yourself again?

https://sos-res.state.de.us/tin/GINameSearch.jsp

File Number: 0042817 Incorporation Date / Formation Date: 09/03/1914

(mm/dd/yyyy)

Entity Name: FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION

Entity Kind: CORPORATION Entity Type: NON-PROFIT OR RELIGIOUS

Residency: DOMESTIC State: DE

REGISTERED AGENT INFORMATION

Name: DELAWARE BUSINESS INCORPORATORS, INC.

Address: 3422 OLD CAPITOL TRAIL SUITE 700

City: WILMINGTON County: NEW CASTLE

State: DE Postal Code: 19808

Phone: (302)996-5819

Here are some relative quotes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tukk8ZwySz0

And what did Woorow Wilson have to say after signing off on the Federal Reserve Act of 1913?

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence

Unfortunately, we have not currently posted sources, so take it as such.

The Money Masters ; Money, Banking and the Federal Reserve ; The Creature From Jekyl Island; Freedom to Fascism Director's Authorized Version ; Andrew Gause ; Liberty Dollar .... all good video.google.com searches.

Cashless Society you say? They certainly hope. Microchips FTL! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1263677258215075609

As for my inquiry:

I'm a bit lazy now, so excuse me for asking you to carefully reconsider my post #40 in this thread and and basically repeating with little explanation.

http://www.binrev.com/forums/index.php?sho...st&p=280229

In reference to your statement that those in the beheading vid are probably unaware of Hitler's interest in "the occult" comment:

"http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8795795223394289910

Same shit, different asshole. But, what is your point in reference to this vid? Are you assuming if they [beheaders in vid] knew [about the occult relation] then they'd not do this? I doubt [that this would change their behavior]."

Immediately followed by your comment: "Further invalidating a Neo-Nazi regime (not that it is not invalidated enough already)." ...as if their lack of this understanding invalidates them in some manner in your view. To which I also inquired:

Invalidating a Neo-Nazi, as in they are not true to the Paleo-Nazi or there is yet another reason to condemn them for their beliefs?

You only replied to my second question, and even so you only made a general statement in saying that you do not condemn beliefs but instead actions. However, especially in this case, their beliefs are the source of their actions. So, replace the word "beliefs" with "actions" if you wish; but I'm curious about your direct answer the question.

Misunderstandings are normal, unfortunately; especially on the net.

We are not always debating, or having a round of civil discourse but sometimes simply discussing. I, too, enjoy intelligent company, in reciprocation of your compliment. Thanks.

Edited by KnowShtuff
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. I'm surprised that someone else knows this!

Wait a minute! This means Bush isn't a moral uplifting Christian like he says he is!

:lol:

Next step is for you to read some books on mind control.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Right on, delicatessen. Expounding on some statesments I have made previously.

baby-hackribs,

Mayer Rothschild said that. The Rothschilds are the creators of the fractional reserve, fiat currency banking system that currently prevails through the majority of the world and that many would argue are the central issues with this country. Maybe you are aware that the Federal Reserve is not any more federal than Federal Express? It's a private Delaware Corporation operated for profit (regardless of the non-profit type) with tax exempt status (the reason for the non-profit or religious type). It is an unnecessary middle man in our society that heavily burdens our citizens with unnecessary taxes and political control. Read the Rothschild quote to yourself again?

https://sos-res.state.de.us/tin/GINameSearch.jsp

File Number: 0042817 Incorporation Date / Formation Date: 09/03/1914

(mm/dd/yyyy)

Entity Name: FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION

Entity Kind: CORPORATION Entity Type: NON-PROFIT OR RELIGIOUS

Residency: DOMESTIC State: DE

REGISTERED AGENT INFORMATION

Name: DELAWARE BUSINESS INCORPORATORS, INC.

Address: 3422 OLD CAPITOL TRAIL SUITE 700

City: WILMINGTON County: NEW CASTLE

State: DE Postal Code: 19808

Phone: (302)996-5819

Here are some relative quotes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tukk8ZwySz0

And what did Woorow Wilson have to say after signing off on the Federal Reserve Act of 1913?

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence

Unfortunately, we have not currently posted sources, so take it as such.

The Money Masters ; Money, Banking and the Federal Reserve ; The Creature From Jekyl Island; Freedom to Fascism Director's Authorized Version ; Andrew Gause ; Liberty Dollar .... all good video.google.com searches.

Cashless Society you say? They certainly hope. Microchips FTL! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1263677258215075609

As for my inquiry:

I'm a bit lazy now, so excuse me for asking you to carefully reconsider my post #40 in this thread and and basically repeating with little explanation.

http://www.binrev.com/forums/index.php?sho...st&p=280229

In reference to your statement that those in the beheading vid are probably unaware of Hitler's interest in "the occult" comment:

"http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8795795223394289910

Same shit, different asshole. But, what is your point in reference to this vid? Are you assuming if they [beheaders in vid] knew [about the occult relation] then they'd not do this? I doubt [that this would change their behavior]."

Immediately followed by your comment: "Further invalidating a Neo-Nazi regime (not that it is not invalidated enough already)." ...as if their lack of this understanding invalidates them in some manner in your view. To which I also inquired:

Invalidating a Neo-Nazi, as in they are not true to the Paleo-Nazi or there is yet another reason to condemn them for their beliefs?

You only replied to my second question, and even so you only made a general statement in saying that you do not condemn beliefs but instead actions. However, especially in this case, their beliefs are the source of their actions. So, replace the word "beliefs" with "actions" if you wish; but I'm curious about your direct answer the question.

Misunderstandings are normal, unfortunately; especially on the net.

We are not always debating, or having a round of civil discourse but sometimes simply discussing. I, too, enjoy intelligent company, in reciprocation of your compliment. Thanks.

Ahh, ok now I believe I understand your question and the answer is Yes. Here's why, I uphold the belief that in order to institute a political theory you must know EVERYTHING about it... well everything that you can know about it. How it works, why it was started in the first place, the consequences of erecting such an apparatus and how to effectively stave off the eventual erosion of it's founding ideas.

Look at what Stalin did to communism, look at what China has done to communism. Though both may/or may not have under stood communism, it should be noted that one really must be committed to the ideology... these people in this video are two very sick fucks that wanted to kill somebody.

Does that answer your question?

--p0d

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow. I'm surprised that someone else knows this!

Wait a minute! This means Bush isn't a moral uplifting Christian like he says he is!

:lol:

Next step is for you to read some books on mind control.

Way ahead of you, kid. Been knowing this for years. MKULTRA, Project Paperclip, Most Dangerous Game, TranceFormation, more .... been there ... done that. ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahh, ok now I believe I understand your question and the answer is Yes. Here's why, I uphold the belief that in order to institute a political theory you must know EVERYTHING about it... well everything that you can know about it. How it works, why it was started in the first place, the consequences of erecting such an apparatus and how to effectively stave off the eventual erosion of it's founding ideas.

Look at what Stalin did to communism, look at what China has done to communism. Though both may/or may not have under stood communism, it should be noted that one really must be committed to the ideology... these people in this video are two very sick fucks that wanted to kill somebody.

Does that answer your question?

--p0d

My first question is more appropriately answered by Yes or No. The second question is appropriately answered by picking one of two different answers I provided within it to expound on or being creative with a third option.

To address your reply:

It is not at all an ULTIMATE TRUTH that you MUST know EVERYTHING about a political theory to institute any portion of it. If you really think about what you are saying instead of what you would like to be saying, then hopefully you'll agree with me when I say that I don't see how an intelligent person as yourself could ever support exactly what you are saying because it is not at all intelligent. However, I support your IDEALISTIC belief that in order to institute any portion of a political theory then one SHOULD know EVERYTHING about it. ;)

Your points are understood, even when dissected from presentation that is likely below your norm and certainly below your potential. ;)

HOWEVER, no, it does not answer my question. There are two questions. You could argue that you answered the first one; but I'd argue that you did not. You think that these people simply knowing about some of Hitler's mumbo jumbo beliefs in occultism would be enough motive to sway them from all the rest of their beliefs that caused them to kill the people as depicted? Same question, rephrased. My answer is the same: I doubt it. What they did is far worse than what various would argue between 90-99% of beliefs in "the occult"; and whether they cared for "the occult" or not it is such a small and esoteric portion of Nazi idealogy that I find it incredibly unlikely that it would sway them from their actions. Most people who are so offended by "the occult", that they may allow this small tainting of a more practical and vast political theory to sway them from the practices of the theory, are usually believers in a religion that vehemently opposes "the occult" simply because the scripture opposes the occult ... and these religions usually oppose things like beheadings .... so it is highly unlikely that they believe in such things or thus care about "the occult" whether they know of how it somewhat indirectly relates to Nazism or not since they did in fact behead the man.

Furthermore, let's not forget that you have simply theorized they do not know about such beliefs. You may be correct or incorrect. They obviously know how to get their video up on the internet so they exhibit nearly all of the potential they need to learn about Hitler's beliefs in the occult. For all you know, the beheading could have been one of the more tainted practices in "the occult" in which some believe in blood sacrifice ... though the beheading certainly wasn't publicly glorified for that purpose.

Try again? :P;)

Edited by KnowShtuff
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baby-Hackribs, you have an amazing and awesome handle.

I bow to you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Baby-Hackribs, you have an amazing and awesome handle.

I bow to you.

It's good. It's really good. But, not that good. ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0