Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
sycorax

Conspiracy

12 posts in this topic

There was no Conspiracy, now take your pill, give us your rights, watch your TV.

Really it could be. I'm not doubting it. But I don't think the BBC was live in NYC at the time

They may of used a green screen and film form a few mins early.

It's wired right, WTC 1.2.7 all fell in a few hours. But yet no tower ever in history

fell because of fire. They were the first towers ever to fall because of fire, all on the day.

See you guys all in the death camps later.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blah blah blah blahbittdy blah.

I'm tired of using facts to refute this stupid shit. You fucking people never listen to facts anyway. Look up the other 15 threads on this crap and read for yourself.

False flag ops happen all the damn time. Doesn't mean everything is false flag ops. JEEBUS.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But Chomsky says it's not true.

Ward Churchill says it's a good thing it happened.

Good enough for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But Chomsky says it's not true.

Ward Churchill says it's a good thing it happened.

Good enough for me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzGd0t8v-d4

http://blog.zmag.org/node/2779

Chomsky writes that "if activists here prefer ... to focus their attention on arcane and dubious theories about 9/11," then power centers will have an easier time perpetuating actual crimes.

Want to make fun of someone? Go ahead- but try to stay within the realm of reality.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But Chomsky says it's not true.

Ward Churchill says it's a good thing it happened.

Good enough for me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzGd0t8v-d4

http://blog.zmag.org/node/2779

Chomsky writes that "if activists here prefer ... to focus their attention on arcane and dubious theories about 9/11," then power centers will have an easier time perpetuating actual crimes.

Want to make fun of someone? Go ahead- but try to stay within the realm of reality.

But Chomsky says it's not true.

Ward Churchill says it's a good thing it happened.

Good enough for me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzGd0t8v-d4

http://blog.zmag.org/node/2779

Chomsky writes that "if activists here prefer ... to focus their attention on arcane and dubious theories about 9/11," then power centers will have an easier time perpetuating actual crimes.

Want to make fun of someone? Go ahead- but try to stay within the realm of reality.

I was being half serious. I like Chomsky and almost totally agree with him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy that owned 7 even said that he gave the order to demolish it @.@

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was being half serious. I like Chomsky and almost totally agree with him.

:wacko: you're screwin' with my mind, man.

My bad, then.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres really one reason why i think it was wired: putting aside your ideas of 9/11, what do you think it would look like if a skyscraper got slammed into by a plane? I bet it didn't fall gracefully onto it's own footprint? I bet the half above where the plane hit fell before the bottom, or at least buckled at the point. The tower falling... it just looks to planned. It meets 11 criteria for a planned demolition, there were multiple witnesses saying they saw flashes at the base of the tower, and one even said "like when they demolish buildings" (im paraphrasing). I was amazed at how quickly they disposed of the evidence, it wasn't treated like evidence at an important crime scene, it was promptly shipped away for recycling. Look at the obvious stuff.

Haliburton recently moved it's headquarters to the middle east to "take advantage" of the areas resources.

Happy hacking :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To shift gears a bit, I think a great conspiracy that hasnt been touched on , is all these various "missing" laptops from credit, gov, and other agencies that have a plethora of "valuable" inside information.. I think that this is all BS.. This is a basic level attempt to cover tracks for insider trading or obvious selling the information on servers before hand.. Most all companies where employees do work from home that involves this type of information, is tracked via VPN and very little saved offline information goes..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Theres really one reason why i think it was wired: putting aside your ideas of 9/11, what do you think it would look like if a skyscraper got slammed into by a plane? I bet it didn't fall gracefully onto it's own footprint? I bet the half above where the plane hit fell before the bottom, or at least buckled at the point. The tower falling... it just looks to planned. It meets 11 criteria for a planned demolition, there were multiple witnesses saying they saw flashes at the base of the tower, and one even said "like when they demolish buildings" (im paraphrasing). I was amazed at how quickly they disposed of the evidence, it wasn't treated like evidence at an important crime scene, it was promptly shipped away for recycling. Look at the obvious stuff.

Haliburton recently moved it's headquarters to the middle east to "take advantage" of the areas resources.

Happy hacking :)

Planned demolitions are performed under planned circumstances, not after the building has been hit by a jet flying a few hundred mph shy of mach 1.

Planned demolitions don't leave debris all over a city.

Don't let the movies you watch like Loose change for example skew your perception of the truth.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Popular Mechanics prove the theories wrong:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology...aw/1227842.html

Edited by matt
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Planned demolitions are performed under planned circumstances, not after the building has been hit by a jet flying a few hundred mph shy of mach 1.

I don't think it was supposed to be precise more than it was to cause "shock and awe" like the "New Pearl Harbor" called for in the PNAC documents.

Planned demolitions don't leave debris all over a city.

Actually, there was not much debris, as it was dust.

Don't let the movies you watch like Loose change for example skew your perception of the truth.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Wait... Are you honestly trying to tell me that you are adressing a serious issue like this with a satirical website, that uses demagogy, childish mockery, and straw man arguements? Talk about skewing...

Popular Mechanics prove the theories wrong:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology...aw/1227842.html

With straw man arguements.

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/index.html

Edited by WhatChout
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0