censored in 2600
Posted 30 January 2003 - 06:14 PM
better yet get it from the articles page, i cant find it in the forums
Posted 30 January 2003 - 09:35 PM
(Has anyone else found this issue's hidden message?)
Posted 30 January 2003 - 10:46 PM
I am surprised at the censoring, especially since 2600 is usually about free speech. Are you sure the version you sent them had it in there? Perhaps you cleaned it up yourself and forgot about it? IF not, 2600 becomes pretty hypocritical all of a sudden.
*Don't tell me the hidden message yet! And don't tell me what the page 33 trick is this issue either!*
Posted 30 January 2003 - 11:40 PM
1. they deleted my F-word after talking about "in all likelyhood the corporations would roll right fucking over us again."
2. In the Not Practical section, they changed my original
"It is almost unheard of that a honeypot
traps someone of truly elite status, because it is designed to keep the
kidies at bay to allow the admin to do personal battle with the
It is almost unheard of that a honeypot traps someone with real skill because it is designed to keep the kiddies at bay."
3. In the next paragraph, they shortened "in the digital arms race that is crackers vs. admins..." to "in the digital arms race..."
OK, having said that, I do like most of the changes. I am NOT God's gift to the text community. The 2600 staff are the professionals here, not me. Actually, after reading their version, I'm grateful for them saving me the e-mail displeasure of people saying "samauri? WTF kind of 1992 language is that?" I will take their changes as "constructive criticism." I'm going to file that as advice from professionals that have been in the business for nearly 20 years, and I have everything to learn. The only problem i have with any of the changes is that they ommitted my fucking f-word. I think that saying (the MPAA) rolled right fucking over us is a true statement. The effect was kind of tarnished by plainly stating that they rolled over us. Also, this was written the same night that 3q02 came out, and I had been back in the community for all of 16 hours when i sent this thing in. My references to "Elites" and "samauri" may have been a little obtuse, or at the very least outdated, and I'm trying to make my files cleaner, with more fact and less preaching. I think I have come a long way since I wrote that, and won't stop learning 'till they throw me in a box and plant me.
Posted 31 January 2003 - 12:21 AM
Either print it "as-is", or don't print it. I understand you are happy with the changes, but I just lost a huge deal of respect for 2600. Any time I hear them say "free speech" again, I will laugh.
edited: I looked through their web site and several back issues to see if they had any rules or disclosure of their editing practices. I found nothing.
Posted 31 January 2003 - 10:07 AM
Posted 31 January 2003 - 01:54 PM
removing words and entire phrases is consorship. Plain and simple. Those sentences could have been "edited" without being "censored" IMHO.
I guess I will have to give them the benefit of the doubt that they could not edit any better than that.
Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:12 PM
Posted 01 February 2003 - 01:00 PM
Posted 01 February 2003 - 02:12 PM
and easier to read? Have you read some of the shit they print sometimes? I have to read it 2 or 3 times to figure out what the author was saying! The lack of punctuation in this issue alone is appaling!
I think you are right Screamer, I just don't like it. No consistancy.
BinRev is hosted by the great people at Lunarpages!