The death of Livengood
#1
Posted 02 March 2011 - 05:55 PM
It looks like Jim River Camp (907-541) followed, too.
#2
Posted 03 March 2011 - 11:06 AM
#3
Posted 03 March 2011 - 04:12 PM
#4
Posted 03 March 2011 - 09:03 PM
You can still reach the recording, and it still supes - just sounds very clean... too clean...
Edited by dmine45, 03 March 2011 - 09:06 PM.
#5
Posted 03 March 2011 - 09:48 PM
As far as I know, they were the last ones in the US.That sucks... weren't these pretty much the last analog 2600 Hz controlled trunks out there?
You can still reach the recording, and it still supes - just sounds very clean... too clean...
There's some records and CD's I've been listening to so many times that I remember all of their skips and pops. Every time I hear those recordings on the radio or at somebody's house, I'll "hear" the pop or skip in its expected place even though it's not there. A similar phenomenon occurs when I call a disconnected number in Livengood. I still hear a 2600Hz "cheep" at the end of the recording, even though it's not there. I'll never be able to hear that recording without placing a wink of 2600Hz at the end.
#6
Posted 05 March 2011 - 04:32 PM
Anywho, we all knew this day had to come. So in 2009, I got the closest I could get to a perfect sample of the carrier systems. There was a strange thing you could do with the Jim River Camp trunks where on a call that wasn't suped, if you whistled 2600 quietly enough, it would just go silent - the trunk wouldn't wink or anything, it would just do nothing. It didn't work when I made this recording, but after the trunk winked, the reorder stopped anyway.
http://thoughtphreak.../audio/jrc.flac
On Livengood, I was just lazy and let a busy signal time out to silence.
http://thoughtphreak...audio/liv1.flac
http://thoughtphreak...audio/liv2.flac
Expect recordings with more goings on in them soon. If you happen to have any, please add yours.
#7
Posted 05 March 2011 - 08:49 PM
Thanks for sharing your recordings.
#8
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:38 PM
Actually I have a pretty leet scanner context for asterisk that works really well I'm about to give out.
To name a few of the functions, it has random trunk selection, random callerid selection, different modes of scanning (nxx scanning, line scanning and autodial scanning (yuck)) - so it still has the appeal to the OCD (liek me) but takes out the digits we don't really need to use. The best thing of all, it supports multiple users as well as it's a feature code to toggle on/off. Varibles get saved on the fly when you dial 10 digits then afterwards depending upon which mode you;re in you just dial the nxx or line.
This scanner came into light when we were going through the projekt ak (that never got finished lol)
peace peace
#9
Posted 26 April 2011 - 10:01 PM
#10
Posted 02 May 2011 - 05:41 PM
#11
Posted 10 May 2011 - 10:50 PM
So here's an abbreviated version;
Livengood was R1, not C5. C5 definitely exists though, but the numbers aren't just few and far between. Unlike the Livengoods of the world, where you just have access to the incoming trunk group, fraud is a very real threat to them, so the fraud detection equipment is usually very keen to catch these things. Especially these days, when black routes come and go like bad fads. So start scanning, and when you do, start doing your homework on the way these circuits work.
R1, possibly R2, and it's variants still continue to live on in other places. Russia actually has their own little bizarre MF system set up. I might cover this later, depending on how people feel about this. Here in the states, it's actually used a lot more than you'd think. The only problem is, it's inband signaling over T-carrier circuits, so the supervision is all out of band. If you can find a way to fool these switches into thinking the trunk has reset though, certainly more power to you. Switch bugs of all kinds are out there - I've covered a few here in past posts.
As for things that don't use it for inter-office signaling, those are around too. Take this ANAC for example; 503-697-0053. The second it goes offhook, it expects keypulse, three, seven MF digits, and then a start. If you decide to send this, be sure to make it fairly loud. The ANAC can be a little picky.
And then there's this; 419-646-2368. As far as I can tell, this is the last AIS out there that'll let you hear MF digits like this. Anybody up for a phone trip?
Edited by ThoughtPhreaker, 10 May 2011 - 10:52 PM.
#12
Posted 11 May 2011 - 09:02 AM
Bleah, I had a good reply for this, but I hit the refresh button on accident >.<
So here's an abbreviated version;
Livengood was R1, not C5. C5 definitely exists though, but the numbers aren't just few and far between. Unlike the Livengoods of the world, where you just have access to the incoming trunk group, fraud is a very real threat to them, so the fraud detection equipment is usually very keen to catch these things. Especially these days, when black routes come and go like bad fads. So start scanning, and when you do, start doing your homework on the way these circuits work.
R1, possibly R2, and it's variants still continue to live on in other places. Russia actually has their own little bizarre MF system set up. I might cover this later, depending on how people feel about this. Here in the states, it's actually used a lot more than you'd think. The only problem is, it's inband signaling over T-carrier circuits, so the supervision is all out of band. If you can find a way to fool these switches into thinking the trunk has reset though, certainly more power to you. Switch bugs of all kinds are out there - I've covered a few here in past posts.
As for things that don't use it for inter-office signaling, those are around too. Take this ANAC for example; 503-697-0053. The second it goes offhook, it expects keypulse, three, seven MF digits, and then a start. If you decide to send this, be sure to make it fairly loud. The ANAC can be a little picky.
And then there's this; 419-646-2368. As far as I can tell, this is the last AIS out there that'll let you hear MF digits like this. Anybody up for a phone trip?
Thanks for clarifying, I am still new to the phreaking world. Would you happen to have a link to where I could learn more about R1?
#13
Posted 17 May 2011 - 03:02 AM
So a classic example of this would be, say, dialing a supervision test on a 2600-controlled circuit;
http://thoughtphreak...1_supetest.flac
In this case, it's seize, KP, 1103, ST, and then the call begins.
So KP + number + ST is relatively standard, but there's tons of equipment out there that wants something else. There's even an extension for using carrier access codes and ANI-II digits over it.
#14
Posted 22 June 2011 - 09:12 PM
BinRev is hosted by the great people at Lunarpages!












