Also quick question IndexPhinger, do you happen to know if the 64 MB CF Card limitation has been solved yet with the MSNTv boxes?
Edited by SUB-S0NIX, 13 April 2009 - 04:04 PM.
Posted 13 April 2009 - 02:29 AM
Edited by SUB-S0NIX, 13 April 2009 - 04:04 PM.
Posted 13 April 2009 - 09:53 AM
Posted 15 April 2009 - 03:02 PM
Posted 15 April 2009 - 03:15 PM
I just discovered my little brother's computer runs on an 854 chipset, and the graphics aren't half bad, but the way these boxes have it set up I should see a bit better preformance, because the set top boxes are more tightly designed to that CPU.
Posted 15 April 2009 - 03:28 PM
I just discovered my little brother's computer runs on an 854 chipset, and the graphics aren't half bad, but the way these boxes have it set up I should see a bit better preformance, because the set top boxes are more tightly designed to that CPU.
More ram? Faster FSB? What's better?
Posted 15 April 2009 - 09:36 PM
I just discovered my little brother's computer runs on an 854 chipset, and the graphics aren't half bad, but the way these boxes have it set up I should see a bit better preformance, because the set top boxes are more tightly designed to that CPU.
More ram? Faster FSB? What's better?
The way the hardware is arranged, as this IBM board is your run of the mill box.
the TV boxes are designed for bulk data, as they get 5mbps streams for each of the channels normally, hence why they'd be perfect for streaming video.
I had this idea, having a main device (preferably one of the white ones) as a Streamer, and the black ones as receivers.
![]()
Posted 15 April 2009 - 09:50 PM
I just discovered my little brother's computer runs on an 854 chipset, and the graphics aren't half bad, but the way these boxes have it set up I should see a bit better preformance, because the set top boxes are more tightly designed to that CPU.
More ram? Faster FSB? What's better?
The way the hardware is arranged, as this IBM board is your run of the mill box.
the TV boxes are designed for bulk data, as they get 5mbps streams for each of the channels normally, hence why they'd be perfect for streaming video.
I had this idea, having a main device (preferably one of the white ones) as a Streamer, and the black ones as receivers.
![]()
I'd cluster them lol
Posted 15 April 2009 - 10:27 PM
Posted 16 April 2009 - 10:33 AM
telco trash, that guy, the trashbin of telus technicians.If you don't mind telling us how you go about getting your hardware? Bribes? lol.
Posted 20 April 2009 - 03:26 AM
Posted 20 April 2009 - 03:35 AM
Fuuuuuuuuuuuu~
The mobo my girlfreind got me takes RDRAM and has a soldered bios, at least she triedI love her for that.
I guess I could sell it and get another intel mobo.
Posted 20 April 2009 - 06:29 AM
telco trash, that guy, the trashbin of telus technicians.If you don't mind telling us how you go about getting your hardware? Bribes? lol.
trashin 4 Dox is so 1990
Posted 20 April 2009 - 11:53 PM
telco trash, that guy, the trashbin of telus technicians.If you don't mind telling us how you go about getting your hardware? Bribes? lol.
trashin 4 Dox is so 1990
Telus technicians? Do you mind giving me social engineering advice?
Posted 07 May 2009 - 07:32 PM
BinRev is hosted by the great people at Lunarpages!