Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

I'm Buying An iPhone!!


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#21 Perf-149

Perf-149

    Hakker addict

  • Members
  • 502 posts
  • Location:Location is key!

Posted 13 July 2007 - 01:27 PM

I know many (most) GSM networks in the US claim that EDGE is 3G even though it doesn't technically have speeds fast enough to classify it as a 3G. (some call it 2.75G)

I am not entirely sure if the link I posted is the one that covers AT&T's WCDMA network, but I do know that a few years back AT&T along with Ericksson announced the launch of the first North American widespread WCDMA network. Haven't heard anything more about it since however.

#22 natas

natas

    De La Natas

  • Agents of the Revolution
  • 4,273 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Old Skool

Posted 13 July 2007 - 04:37 PM

EDGE is DEFINITELY NOT 3G. That shits not that fast. Especially compared to EVDO.

Anyways, if you want to spam me on my iPhone it's "myhackediphone@gmail.youknowwhatgoeshere"

#23 Kurced

Kurced

    second chance

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 16 July 2007 - 10:49 AM

Cingular has launched a high-speed network known as "BroadbandConnect," based on UMTS and High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA), to counter Verizon Wireless and Sprint's EV-DO networks. UMTS service was launched on December 6, 2005 in Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Salt Lake City, San Jose, San Diego, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Puerto Rico, Austin, Houston, Dallas, Detroit, Chicago, Boston, Baltimore and Washington D.C. Cingular expected to launch UMTS in all major metropolitan markets by the end of 2006, as of June 15th 2007, the service is available across much of the United States.

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cingular

So yea, not going to be WCDMA.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W-CDMA

On the right side of the page has a list of the evolution of cellular networks.

Edited by Kurced, 16 July 2007 - 10:51 AM.


#24 doug

doug

    BinRev veteran

  • Members
  • 1,194 posts
  • Location:socal

Posted 17 July 2007 - 06:36 AM

From what i was told...the apple iphone is the same material used as the ipod. Which means as crappy as the ipods are and how easily they get scratched why the hell would you want to have that same problem with your personal mobile phone. unless it really is "tough"

i'd still rather stick with a blackberry w/ evdo.

#25 natas

natas

    De La Natas

  • Agents of the Revolution
  • 4,273 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Old Skool

Posted 17 July 2007 - 08:31 AM

The screen is actually made of this really tough glass. The iPod isn't made out of that. Also, from everything I've read, the iPhone is surprisingly durable. People have like dropped it on the cement and shit like that on purpose and it was fine. Something that wouldn't happen with the iPod.

#26 Kurced

Kurced

    second chance

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 18 July 2007 - 09:06 PM

http://gizmodo.com/g...each-279792.php

Hah.

#27 teh l33t tj

teh l33t tj

    Gibson Hacker

  • Members
  • 92 posts
  • Location:The Twilight Zone

Posted 18 July 2007 - 10:00 PM

Too expensive for a device you can't expand as easily as palm os.

I still love my treo 650, i have over 500mb of apps for it so i can do almost anything. I do need a new ipod though my old one just got fried :( .

I demoed it at AT&T place the other day and found out they had it connected to the in-store wifi so the browser was faster that slow old edge. I disable wifi so safari was really slow :pirate:

teh l33t tj

#28 0sw4ld

0sw4ld

    SUP3R 31337

  • Members
  • 156 posts

Posted 19 July 2007 - 10:11 PM

You still rock natas, but this is funny as hell.

http://www.thebestpa.../c.cgi?u=iphone

Edited by 0sw4ld, 19 July 2007 - 10:13 PM.


#29 bjorn

bjorn

    H4x0r

  • Members
  • 35 posts

Posted 29 July 2007 - 01:02 AM

Don't get owned.

http://www.securitye...ors.com/iphone/




BinRev is hosted by the great people at Lunarpages!