Covert Call, pwned.
Started by
Athnex
, Mar 17 2005 04:28 AM
27 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 18 March 2005 - 10:37 AM
There's those two and Star38, which is out of business anyway. Other than those three I'm not sure how many competitors out there that don't use VoIP.
At the very least, the owners of the two web sites will be getting a full refund.
At the very least, the owners of the two web sites will be getting a full refund.
#22
Posted 18 March 2005 - 12:19 PM
What makes you think Star38 is out of business?There's those two and Star38, which is out of business anyway. Other than those three I'm not sure how many competitors out there that don't use VoIP.
#23
Posted 18 March 2005 - 07:16 PM
It seems that it would be better to do it yourself and not rely on these type of providers, if they can't secure their own site, I doubt your personal records are safe. Just like Stank said go elsewhere.
#24
Posted 09 June 2005 - 05:07 PM
covertcall really dead now
spooftel's next on the list price/quality but they're not covertcall!
long live spoofing!!!
#25
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:18 PM
Quality? I never heard anything good about CovertCall's quality but I have to admit you can't really beat their price.
#26
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:44 PM
yeah covertcall is fucking done. finally. they were so lame. i saw a screen shot of their database the other day. those fuckers got owned so bad. same with camophone, but atleast camophone didnt have credit card numbers and shit.
#27
Posted 10 June 2005 - 01:44 AM
True, as far as I know camophones cc's didn't leak. But to this day, camophones database&asterisk box are still insecure. Some people didn't stop at the mass-hosting server & lame phpbb exploit.
Edited by nazareth2, 10 June 2005 - 01:46 AM.
#28
Posted 12 June 2005 - 04:14 PM
Anyone know much about how spoofing works? because there has been a change in cell phone networks.
Everyone remembers the voicemail vulnerability where you could bypass ringing the phone and having to enter a PIN. People would have no idea you were even doing it. Now the phone companies changed something. I tried to figure it out on my friends phone and there is a different line with crappy reception when you call with the same caller id, works fine if you use any other. I tried it on my cell and it went straight to my voicemail, but the message went extra fast without the voice prompts. When I left a message and checked it it was from phone number 555-555-5555. Wonder what they changed, do they check ANI now for verification? Any explanations?
Everyone remembers the voicemail vulnerability where you could bypass ringing the phone and having to enter a PIN. People would have no idea you were even doing it. Now the phone companies changed something. I tried to figure it out on my friends phone and there is a different line with crappy reception when you call with the same caller id, works fine if you use any other. I tried it on my cell and it went straight to my voicemail, but the message went extra fast without the voice prompts. When I left a message and checked it it was from phone number 555-555-5555. Wonder what they changed, do they check ANI now for verification? Any explanations?
BinRev is hosted by the great people at Lunarpages!












